Hinkle v. Story
22 S.E. 333, 96 Ga. 776
This text of 22 S.E. 333 (Hinkle v. Story) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinkle v. Story, 22 S.E. 333, 96 Ga. 776 (Ga. 1895).
Opinion
There was no legal merit in the motion for a continu-, anee; and as, under the facts in evidence, the property levied on was manifestly, and beyond doubt, subject to the plaintiffs’ exe* cution, there was no error in directing a verdict accordingly.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Daniel v. State
163 S.E.2d 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Stewart v. Bank of Social Circle
28 S.E. 249 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 333, 96 Ga. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinkle-v-story-ga-1895.