Hinkle v. Hixon
113 S.E. 805, 154 Ga. 193, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 328
Opinions
1. Fraud voids all contracts. Civil Code (1910), § 4254. 2. Parol evidence is admissible to show that a writing was either originally void or has subsequently become such. Civil Code (1910), § 5790.
3. The amendment to the plaintiff’s petition did not set forth a new cause of action, and was properly allowed by the court.
4. The petition set forth a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer thereto on any of the grounds thereof.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hinkle v. Hixon, 113 S.E. 805, 154 Ga. 193, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 328 (Ga. 1922).
113 S.E. 805 (Hinkle v. Hixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. Westmoreland, Hall & Bryan
182 S.E.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Altman v. Moses
37 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Hinkle v. Hixon
136 S.E. 280 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)