Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic Found

Ohio Supreme Court

Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic Found

828 N.E.2d 116, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1560

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 25, 2005

Docket2005-0334

StatusPublished

This text of 828 N.E.2d 116 (Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic Found) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic Found, 828 N.E.2d 116, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1560 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 83721, 159 Ohio App.3d 351, 2004-Ohio-6853. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law III.

Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on all propositions of law. O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., would accept the appeal and also hold the cause for the decision in 2004- 0048, Beard v. Meridia Hospital, Cuyahoga App. No. 82541, 2003-Ohio-5929. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 83721, 159 Ohio App.3d 351, 2004-Ohio-6853. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law III.

Pfeifer, J., would accept the appeal on all propositions of law. O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., would accept the appeal and also hold the cause for the decision in 2004- 0048, Beard v. Meridia Hospital, Cuyahoga App. No. 82541, 2003-Ohio-5929. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

828 N.E.2d 116, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinkle-v-cleveland-clinic-found-ohio-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack