Hingle v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
This text of 25 So. 3d 143 (Hingle v. Scottsdale Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dwayne HINGLE
v.
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Because the policy number was unavailable at the time the waiver was executed, its omission does not invalidate the form. See Carter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 07-1294 (La.10/5/07), 964 So.2d 375. We further find relator, has established the representative signing the waiver form had authority to do so. See Harper v. Direct General Insurance Company, 08-2874 (La.2/13/09), 2 So.3d 418. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and summary judgment is granted in favor of relator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 So. 3d 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hingle-v-scottsdale-insurance-company-la-2010.