Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. McLellan

2000 ME 33, 746 A.2d 916, 2000 Me. LEXIS 35
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedFebruary 25, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2000 ME 33 (Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. McLellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. McLellan, 2000 ME 33, 746 A.2d 916, 2000 Me. LEXIS 35 (Me. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company appeals a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Kravchuk, C.J.) determining that Ruth McLellan held an insurable interest in real property at the time that a structure on the property was destroyed by fire. Hing-ham argues that McLellan had no legal or equitable interest in the property and, therefore, had no interest to insure. Because the Court is evenly divided on the issue presented, we affirm the judgment.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
453 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Maine, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 ME 33, 746 A.2d 916, 2000 Me. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hingham-mutual-fire-insurance-v-mclellan-me-2000.