Hinesville Bank v. Rimes
139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 146, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 525
This text of 139 S.E. 134 (Hinesville Bank v. Rimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinesville Bank v. Rimes, 139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 146, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers to the petition.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 146, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinesville-bank-v-rimes-gactapp-1927.