Hinesley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hinesley v. State

1912 OK CR 264, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 706, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 3, 1912·No. No. A-1281.·Published

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Harmon county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 8th day of May, thereafter, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Finding no error in the record prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Harmon county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 8th day of May, thereafter, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Finding no error in the record prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for want of prosecution.

Hinesley v. State, 1912 OK CR 264, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 706, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 264 (Hinesley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.