Hinesley v. State

1912 OK CR 264, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 706, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 3, 1912
DocketNo. A-1281.
StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 264 (Hinesley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinesley v. State, 1912 OK CR 264, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 706, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Harmon county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 8th day of May, thereafter, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Finding no error in the record prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK CR 264, 120 P. 1127, 7 Okla. Crim. 706, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinesley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.