Hines v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

157 A.2d 280, 221 Md. 616
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 19, 1960·No. P. C. No. 71·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

It appearing that at the hearing below a question not referred to in the petition was raised as to whether or not the applicant was entitled to a belated appeal, that this question was not passed upon by the trial court and that a letter there referred to in connection with this matter was not produced, though it was later found among the records of the trial court, it is ORDERED this 19th day of January, 1960, that leave to appeal be and it is hereby granted and the case is remanded to the Criminal Court of Baltimore for consideration, and leave is granted to the applicant to amend his petition so as to present said question, without prejudice to further consideration by this Court of other questions presented by his application for leave to appeal, if said application should be renewed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hines v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 157 A.2d 280, 221 Md. 616 (Md. 1960).

157 A.2d 280 (Hines v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. State
579 A.2d 786 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Waters v. State
547 A.2d 665 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Hines v. Warden
157 A.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1971)
Hines v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
204 A.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Smith v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
159 A.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)