Hines v. United States Government

Fourth Circuit

Hines v. United States Government

206 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2006·No. No. 06-1319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Priscilla Hines appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking social security benefits and denying her mandamus petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hines v. United States, No. 5:04-cv-00726-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We deny Hines’ motion for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Priscilla Hines appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking social security benefits and denying her mandamus petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hines v. United States, No. 5:04-cv-00726-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We deny Hines’ motion for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hines v. United States Government, 206 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

206 F. App'x 256 (Hines v. United States Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.