Hines v. United States ex rel. Nilan

42 F.2d 350, 59 App. D.C. 366, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4274
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 2, 1930·No. No. 5145·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment in mandamus commanding appellant, as Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, to place relator upon the retired list created by the Emergency Officers’ Retirement Act of May 24, 1928 (45 Stat. 735 [38 USCA §§ 581, 582]), with retired pay as provided by that act.

The issue below was made by the relator’s petition, respondent’s answer to the rule to show cause, and relator’s demurrer to the return. The court sustained the demurrer, and the respondent elected to stand upon his [351]*351return, whereupon judgment was entered against him, and-this appeal was taken.

It is agreed by the parties that the issue involved in this ease is essentially similar to that involved in Frank T. Hines, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant v. United States of America ex rel. Stanton K. Livingston, 59 App. D. C. 363, 42 F.(2d) 347, wherein a decision is announced concurrently herewith. Conformably with the court’s opinion in that case the judgment of the lower court in the present ease is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hines v. United States ex rel. Nilan, 42 F.2d 350, 59 App. D.C. 366, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4274 (D.D.C. 1930).

42 F.2d 350 (Hines v. United States ex rel. Nilan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hines v. United States ex rel. Livingston
42 F.2d 347 (District of Columbia, 1930)