Hines v. United States ex rel. Baird
This text of 42 F.2d 351 (Hines v. United States ex rel. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment in mandamus commanding appellant, as Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, to place relator upon the retired list created by the Emergency Officers’ Retirement Act of May 24, 1928 (45 Stat. 735 [38 USCA §§ 581, 582]), with retired pay as provided by that act.
The issue below was made by the relator’s petition, respondent’s answer to the rule to show cause, and relator’s demurrer to the return. The court sustained the demurrer, and the respondent elected to stand upon his return, whereupon judgment was entered against him, and this appeal was taken.
It is agreed by the parties that the issue involved in this ease is essentially similar to that involved in Frank T. Hines, Director of the United States Veterans’ Bureau, Appellant v. United States of America ex rel. Stanton K. Livingston, 59 App. D. C. 363, 42 F.(2d) 347, wherein a decision is announced concurrently herewith. Conformably with the court’s opinion in that case the judgment of the lower court in the present case is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F.2d 351, 59 App. D.C. 367, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-united-states-ex-rel-baird-dcd-1930.