Hines v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
This text of 119 F. 157 (Hines v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fifty feet north of the main track of the Texas ■& Pacific Railway at Pecos City was a side track occupied to the westward of the public crossing with box cars. The plaintiff’s driver, intending to cross both tracks from the northward, stopped, and looked and listened, just behind the box cars, but heard nothing. After safely crossing the side track he attempted to cross the main track, and, although the view of the main track was clear and unobstructed, he neither looked nor listened until it was too late. He was ■certainly guilty of negligence.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 654, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-texas-p-ry-co-ca5-1902.