Hines v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 654, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4659
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1902·No. No. 1,187·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fifty feet north of the main track of the Texas ■& Pacific Railway at Pecos City was a side track occupied to the westward of the public crossing with box cars. The plaintiff’s driver, intending to cross both tracks from the northward, stopped, and looked and listened, just behind the box cars, but heard nothing. After safely crossing the side track he attempted to cross the main track, and, although the view of the main track was clear and unobstructed, he neither looked nor listened until it was too late. He was ■certainly guilty of negligence.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hines v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 119 F. 157, 55 C.C.A. 654, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4659 (5th Cir. 1902).

119 F. 157 (Hines v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Testo v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.
203 P. 1065 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)