Hines v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Hines v. State

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 506

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 6, 1960·No. No. 36329·Published

Opinion

This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted in this court. On hearing, it appeared that the petitioner had plead guilty to seven counts of an indictment for manslaughter involving the killing of seven different people. He was sentenced on each count in accordance with the statute, the sentences to run consecutively. The minimum period of the sentences has not expired.

Petitioner remoMded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted in this court. On hearing, it appeared that the petitioner had plead guilty to seven counts of an indictment for manslaughter involving the killing of seven different people. He was sentenced on each count in accordance with the statute, the sentences to run consecutively. The minimum period of the sentences has not expired.

Petitioner remoMded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Hines v. State, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 506 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 506 (Hines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.