Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hines v. State

Hines v. State

838 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2396, 2003 WL 554424
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNo. 2D02-4235
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 658 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hines v. State, 838 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2396, 2003 WL 554424 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge.

Edrick Lee Hines appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Hines claims that his sentence is illegal under this court’s decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which held chapter'99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. Hines’ claim is facially insufficient as he does not claim that his date of offense is within the window created by Taylor, nor does he inform the court of what he was convicted, all things required to create a facially sufficient Taylor claim. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Hines’ filing a facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2396, 2003 WL 554424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.