Hines v. State

683 So. 2d 571, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11624, 1996 WL 635174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hines v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 737 So. 2d 1182
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1996·No. No. 95-1819·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error affecting appellant’s conviction and sentence, and we therefore affirm. We remand, however, to strike the public defender fee of $500 because it was imposed without notice to appellant of his right to contest this amount. Bryant v. State, 661 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Kirby v. State, 658 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). This disposition is without prejudice to reimposition of this fee upon compliance with section 27.56, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).

MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hines v. State, 683 So. 2d 571, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11624, 1996 WL 635174 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 571 (Hines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kirby v. State
658 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Bryant v. State
661 So. 2d 1315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)