Hines v. State
591 So. 2d 270, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10276, 1991 WL 200144
This text of 591 So. 2d 270 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hines v. State, 591 So. 2d 270, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10276, 1991 WL 200144 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant’s sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moore v. State
392 So. 2d 277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
591 So. 2d 270, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10276, 1991 WL 200144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.