Hines v. State

529 So. 2d 1272, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2004, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3764, 1988 WL 88511
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 1988
DocketNo. 86-2953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 So. 2d 1272 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hines v. State, 529 So. 2d 1272, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2004, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3764, 1988 WL 88511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Lascelles Albert Hines, appeals from the denial of his motion for leave to withdraw plea of nolo contendere and to vacate judgment and sentence.

We have considered each aspect of this appeal and find only one claim meritorious. The appellant asserts, and the state concedes, that the appellant pleaded to an offense which is not a crime in Florida: conspiracy to attempt to possess cannabis with intent to sell.

This matter is therefore remanded to the trial court with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence on Count I. In all other aspects the denial of the appellant’s motions is affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

English v. State
529 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 So. 2d 1272, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2004, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3764, 1988 WL 88511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.