Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hines v. State

420 So. 2d 926, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21457

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 22, 1982

DocketNo. 82-653

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 420 So. 2d 926 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hines v. State, 420 So. 2d 926, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21457 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgments based on the offenses of theft and attempted burglary.

We also remand for correction of the sentence because the trial court failed to comply with the mandate of section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). The sentence must specifically reflect credit for time served. Williams v. State, 360 So.2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgments based on the offenses of theft and attempted burglary.

We also remand for correction of the sentence because the trial court failed to comply with the mandate of section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). The sentence must specifically reflect credit for time served. Williams v. State, 360 So.2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 So. 2d 926, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack