Hines v. State
This text of 338 So. 2d 61 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was the movant in a motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This appeal is from a denial of the motion. The sole ground for relief presented to the trial court was that upon appellant’s guilty pleas he was sentenced on two counts which were [62]*62facets of the same transaction. Count one charged a breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. Count two charged an assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The offenses were clearly subject to separate sentences. See State v. Ray, 331 So.2d 316 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 So. 2d 61, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.