Hines v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hines v. State

338 So. 2d 61, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15564

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1976·No. No. 75-2021·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was the movant in a motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This appeal is from a denial of the motion. The sole ground for relief presented to the trial court was that upon appellant’s guilty pleas he was sentenced on two counts which were [62] facets of the same transaction. Count one charged a breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. Count two charged an assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The offenses were clearly subject to separate sentences. See State v. Ray, 331 So.2d 316 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was the movant in a motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This appeal is from a denial of the motion. The sole ground for relief presented to the trial court was that upon appellant’s guilty pleas he was sentenced on two counts which were [62] facets of the same transaction. Count one charged a breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. Count two charged an assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The offenses were clearly subject to separate sentences. See State v. Ray, 331 So.2d 316 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

Hines v. State, 338 So. 2d 61, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 61 (Hines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related