Hines v. State

195 So. 160, 142 Fla. 517, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1403
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 29, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 So. 160 (Hines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hines v. State, 195 So. 160, 142 Fla. 517, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1403 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record in this case and no reversible error has clearly appeared to us, therefore, the judgment is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Selighman Latz of Jacksonville
38 So. 2d 132 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 So. 160, 142 Fla. 517, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-state-fla-1940.