Hines v. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services

Fourth Circuit

Hines v. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services

328 F. App'x 274

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 2009

DocketNo. 09-1320

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 274 (Hines v. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hines v. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services, 328 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Junior Hines, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action, which alleged that the Defendants negligently cared for his daughter while she was in the care and custody of the Department of Social Services. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hines v. Spartanburg County Dep’t of Social Servs., No. 7:07-cv-03375-GRA, 2009 WL 237837 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Junior Hines, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action, which alleged that the Defendants negligently cared for his daughter while she was in the care and custody of the Department of Social Services. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hines v. Spartanburg County Dep’t of Social Servs., No. 7:07-cv-03375-GRA, 2009 WL 237837 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F. App'x 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-spartanburg-county-department-of-social-services-ca4-2009.