Hines v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hines v. Smith

108 S.E. 818, 27 Ga. App. 406, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 931

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 6, 1921

Docket12335

StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 818 (Hines v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hines v. Smith, 108 S.E. 818, 27 Ga. App. 406, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 931 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Of the special grounds of the motion for new trial approved by the trial judge none is definite enough to present anything for adjudication by this court.

2. “No error of law is pointed out, the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, there is some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, under repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere. Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cases cited.” Perdue v. Hurst, 24 Ga. App. 239 (2) (100 S. E. 647).

Judgment affivrmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI