Hines v. Provence

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hines v. Provence

1936 OK 581, 61 P.2d 561, 177 Okla. 582, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 433

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 6, 1936·No. No. 26852.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached on the 16th day of December, 1935, and on May 13, 1936, filed brief which reasonably Supports the allegations of the petition in error. Defendant in error has filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for such failure.

The cause is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order approving the account and to enter an order surcharging the guardian as prayed for in the petition in error.

McNEILL. C. J.. and BAYLESS, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached on the 16th day of December, 1935, and on May 13, 1936, filed brief which reasonably Supports the allegations of the petition in error. Defendant in error has filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for such failure.

The cause is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order approving the account and to enter an order surcharging the guardian as prayed for in the petition in error.

McNEILL. C. J.. and BAYLESS, WELCH, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Hines v. Provence, 1936 OK 581, 61 P.2d 561, 177 Okla. 582, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 433 (Okla. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK 581 (Hines v. Provence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.