Hines v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hines v. Moore

138 S.E. 671, 164 Ga. 310, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 179

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 17, 1927

DocketNo. 5537

StatusPublished

This text of 138 S.E. 671 (Hines v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hines v. Moore, 138 S.E. 671, 164 Ga. 310, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 179 (Ga. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This case coming before the entire bench of six Justices, the question being whether or not the court erred in granting a temporary injunction, and the Justices being equally divided, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did err, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.

Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.

Courts, 15 C. J. p. 966, n. 78.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

This case coming before the entire bench of six Justices, the question being whether or not the court erred in granting a temporary injunction, and the Justices being equally divided, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did err, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.

Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.

Courts, 15 C. J. p. 966, n. 78.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.E. 671, 164 Ga. 310, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-moore-ga-1927.