Hines v. Industrial Acc. Com.
188 P. 277, 182 Cal. 359, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 522
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 4, 1920
DocketS. F. No. 9384.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 188 P. 277 (Hines v. Industrial Acc. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hines v. Industrial Acc. Com., 188 P. 277, 182 Cal. 359, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 522 (Cal. 1920).
Opinion
We are satisfied that in view of the provisions of section 27a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 855), petitioner cannot avail himself of the agreement relied on.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Olney, J., Wilbur, J., Shaw, J., and Lennon, J., concurred. *Page 360
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
CHICAGO BEARS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC. v. Haynes
816 F. Supp. 2d 534 (N.D. Illinois, 2011)
Black v. Black
118 P.2d 533 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1941)
Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission
34 P.2d 716 (California Supreme Court, 1934)
Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
251 S.W. 612 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 P. 277, 182 Cal. 359, 1920 Cal. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hines-v-industrial-acc-com-cal-1920.