Hine v. Hine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hine v. Hine

28 A.D.2d 817, 281 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3692

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 817 (Hine v. Hine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hine v. Hine, 28 A.D.2d 817, 281 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: The judgment declares and adjudges that the decree of divorce obtained by defendant against the plaintiff in the State of Nevada is not entitled to full faith and credit and is not valid, that the plaintiff is the lawful wife of the defendant and that the marriage of the defendant to one Jane Thompson which occurred subsequent to such divorce decree is illegal and void. No reference to the defendant’s marriage subsequent to the divorce decree is made in the pleadings and the other party to the alleged marriage was not made a party to the action. The adjudication that the marriage of the defendant Kenneth E. Hine to Jane Thompson which occurred subsequent to the aforesaid judgment of divorce of the State of Nevada is illegal, void, and of no force or effect, should therefore be stricken from the judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term declaring foreign divorce invalid.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The judgment declares and adjudges that the decree of divorce obtained by defendant against the plaintiff in the State of Nevada is not entitled to full faith and credit and is not valid, that the plaintiff is the lawful wife of the defendant and that the marriage of the defendant to one Jane Thompson which occurred subsequent to such divorce decree is illegal and void. No reference to the defendant’s marriage subsequent to the divorce decree is made in the pleadings and the other party to the alleged marriage was not made a party to the action. The adjudication that the marriage of the defendant Kenneth E. Hine to Jane Thompson which occurred subsequent to the aforesaid judgment of divorce of the State of Nevada is illegal, void, and of no force or effect, should therefore be stricken from the judgment. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term declaring foreign divorce invalid.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.2d 817, 281 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hine-v-hine-nyappdiv-1967.