Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hindsman v. State

Hindsman v. State

107 S.E. 285, 27 Ga. App. 56, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 681
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1921
Docket12325
StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 285 (Hindsman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hindsman v. State, 107 S.E. 285, 27 Ga. App. 56, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict; it is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 285, 27 Ga. App. 56, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hindsman-v-state-gactapp-1921.