Hinds v. Farmers' Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hinds v. Farmers' Nat. Bank

1915 OK 569, 152 P. 606, 52 Okla. 386, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 296

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 27, 1915

Docket4893

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 569 (Hinds v. Farmers' Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinds v. Farmers' Nat. Bank, 1915 OK 569, 152 P. 606, 52 Okla. 386, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 296 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal is presented for the purpose of reviewing a judgment of the trial court on a promissory note for $599.40. Motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed, for the reason that the cost deposit made with the clerk of this court has been exhausted, and the plaintiff in error refuses to make additional deposit. Upon examination of the records of this court, we find that the cost deposit has been exhausted, that notice for additional deposit for costs has been given as required by law, and that said notice has not been complied with.

We recommend that the motion be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal is presented for the purpose of reviewing a judgment of the trial court on a promissory note for $599.40. Motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed, for the reason that the cost deposit made with the clerk of this court has been exhausted, and the plaintiff in error refuses to make additional deposit. Upon examination of the records of this court, we find that the cost deposit has been exhausted, that notice for additional deposit for costs has been given as required by law, and that said notice has not been complied with.

We recommend that the motion be sustained and the appeal dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 569, 152 P. 606, 52 Okla. 386, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinds-v-farmers-nat-bank-okla-1915.