Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co.

114 So. 673, 22 Ala. App. 265, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 172

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1927

Docket6 Div. 162.

StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 673 (Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co., 114 So. 673, 22 Ala. App. 265, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 172 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

This was a suit brought by 'appellant against appellee claiming damages for the wrongful taking of one Ford automobile. We do not see that any extended discussion of the facts shown by the record is necessary. The trial judge gave the general affirmative' charge in favor of appellee, and we think correctly so.

The evidence shows appellee to have held at the time’of the alleged wrongful taking a valid written lien upon the car in question; in fact, that the legal title to said car was in it. It fails to show that appellant had become a purchaser without notice of appellee’s rights.

The judgment is affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

This was a suit brought by 'appellant against appellee claiming damages for the wrongful taking of one Ford automobile. We do not see that any extended discussion of the facts shown by the record is necessary. The trial judge gave the general affirmative' charge in favor of appellee, and we think correctly so.

The evidence shows appellee to have held at the time’of the alleged wrongful taking a valid written lien upon the car in question; in fact, that the legal title to said car was in it. It fails to show that appellant had become a purchaser without notice of appellee’s rights.

The judgment is affirmed.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 673, 22 Ala. App. 265, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinds-v-commercial-credit-co-alactapp-1927.