Hindmon v. Century Tire Sales Co.

178 So. 2d 703
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 29, 1965·No. No. 34536·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 24, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petitioner’s application for attorneys’ fees is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN j JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hindmon v. Century Tire Sales Co., 178 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1965).

178 So. 2d 703 (Hindmon v. Century Tire Sales Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coast Cities Coaches, Inc. v. Dade County
178 So. 2d 703 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)