Hindman v. Troxell

Indiana Supreme Court

Hindman v. Troxell

15 Ind. 123, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 314

DecidedNovember 30, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 123 (Hindman v. Troxell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hindman v. Troxell, 15 Ind. 123, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 314 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

This was a proceeding under the statute, to procure the distribution of an intestate’s' estate. The case was submitted to the Court, who found for the appellees, who were the plaintiffs below. Judgment was rendered accordingly. There is a bill of exceptions which shows, that during the trial the defendants, the present appellants, excepted to various rulings of the Court, in the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiffs. But there was no motion [124]*124for a new trial, and the errors assigned on the record, relate, exclusively, to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the Court and to its rulings in the admission of evidence, over the defendants’ objection. These assignments of error, there being no motion for a new trial, are not available in this Court. Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, and authorities there cited.

A. Steele and II. D. Thompson, for appellants.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

This was a proceeding under the statute, to procure the distribution of an intestate’s' estate. The case was submitted to the Court, who found for the appellees, who were the plaintiffs below. Judgment was rendered accordingly. There is a bill of exceptions which shows, that during the trial the defendants, the present appellants, excepted to various rulings of the Court, in the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiffs. But there was no motion [124]*124for a new trial, and the errors assigned on the record, relate, exclusively, to the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the Court and to its rulings in the admission of evidence, over the defendants’ objection. These assignments of error, there being no motion for a new trial, are not available in this Court. Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, and authorities there cited.

A. Steele and II. D. Thompson, for appellants.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 123, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hindman-v-troxell-ind-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack