Hindman v. Logan
1 Add. 27
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County
DecidedApril 15, 1792
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 1 Add. 27 (Hindman v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hindman v. Logan, 1 Add. 27 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1792).
Opinion
Ross, cited Guthrie v. White, and Pinchin v. Fry;—and distinguished between evidence to a court, and evidence to a jury.
The court held the first exception sufficient to reverse the proceedings ; and ordered the money to be restored with coils.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Purdy v. Berryhill
887 F.3d 7 (First Circuit, 2018)
Jones v. Jones
428 S.W.3d 578 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Add. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hindman-v-logan-pactcomplwashin-1792.