Hindman v. Logan
1 Add. 27
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County·Decided April 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Ross, cited Guthrie v. White, and Pinchin v. Fry;—and distinguished between evidence to a court, and evidence to a jury.
The court held the first exception sufficient to reverse the proceedings ; and ordered the money to be restored with coils.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hindman v. Logan, 1 Add. 27 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1792).
1 Add. 27 (Hindman v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purdy v. Berryhill
887 F.3d 7 (First Circuit, 2018)
Jones v. Jones
428 S.W.3d 578 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2013)