Hindley v. State

166 S.W.2d 704, 145 Tex. Crim. 176, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 1942
DocketNo. 22339
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.W.2d 704 (Hindley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hindley v. State, 166 S.W.2d 704, 145 Tex. Crim. 176, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534 (Tex. 1942).

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The record before us contains- no bills of exception. The statement of fact discloses that the sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited in McCulloch County, that appellant sold to F. S. Bresenhan, an inspector for the Liquor Control Board, a pint of liquor on December 14, 1941, and that the inspector paid a consideration therefor. Upon these facts, the court assessed a fine of $200.00. The; facts were undisputed and are sufficient to warrant the assessment of the penalty.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnes v. State
356 S.W.2d 679 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 S.W.2d 704, 145 Tex. Crim. 176, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hindley-v-state-texcrimapp-1942.