Hinderlider v. La-Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.

Supreme Court

Hinderlider v. La-Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.

302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 123

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 25, 1937

DocketNo. 437

StatusPublished

This text of 302 U.S. 646 (Hinderlider v. La-Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinderlider v. La-Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co., 302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 123 (1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Colorado.

Further consideration of the question of the jurisdiction of this Court and of the motion to dismiss is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. The Court directs the attention of the Attorney General of the United States to this case, in which the validity of a compact between the States of Colorado and New Mexico of November 27, 1922, approved by Congress on January 29, 1925, is attacked upon the ground that the compact constitutes an unconstitutional interference with the alleged rights of the plaintiff; and the Court invites the Attorney General to submit his views upon the question whether the Act of August 24, 1937, c. 754, 50 Stat. 751, is applicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Colorado.

Further consideration of the question of the jurisdiction of this Court and of the motion to dismiss is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. The Court directs the attention of the Attorney General of the United States to this case, in which the validity of a compact between the States of Colorado and New Mexico of November 27, 1922, approved by Congress on January 29, 1925, is attacked upon the ground that the compact constitutes an unconstitutional interference with the alleged rights of the plaintiff; and the Court invites the Attorney General to submit his views upon the question whether the Act of August 24, 1937, c. 754, 50 Stat. 751, is applicable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 U.S. 646, 58 S. Ct. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinderlider-v-la-plata-river-cherry-creek-ditch-co-scotus-1937.