Hinderer v. Link
241 A.D. 829
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1934
StatusPublished
This text of 241 A.D. 829 (Hinderer v. Link) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinderer v. Link, 241 A.D. 829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Davis, JJ., concur; Young and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial, being of the opinion that plaintiff did not have a fair trial by reason of the remarks of the trial justice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinderer-v-link-nyappdiv-1934.