Hind v. Potterton
115 N.Y.S. 1124
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1909·Published
Opinion
Action by Martha A. Hind, as administratrix, against George A. Potterton, impleaded with others. G. W. Smyth, for appellant. J. B. Quintín, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hind v. Potterton, 115 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
115 N.Y.S. 1124 (Hind v. Potterton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.