Hind v. Central Trust Co.

91 S.E. 998, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 244
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 20, 1917
Docket7842
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 998 (Hind v. Central Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hind v. Central Trust Co., 91 S.E. 998, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 244 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under section 6204 of the Civil Code of 1910, and repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the reviewing court, unless the plaintiff in' error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the trial judge.. The law and the facts in this case do not require the verdict rendered, and the judge did not abuse his discretion in the first grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 998, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hind-v-central-trust-co-gactapp-1917.