Home/New York Court of Appeals/Hinckson v. Selsky

Hinckson v. Selsky

722 N.E.2d 498, 94 N.Y.2d 782, 700 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3617
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 498 (Hinckson v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinckson v. Selsky, 722 N.E.2d 498, 94 N.Y.2d 782, 700 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3617 (N.Y. 1999).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]; 2103 [b] [2]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order denying reargument does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 N.E.2d 498, 94 N.Y.2d 782, 700 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinckson-v-selsky-ny-1999.