Hinckley v. Phelps

84 Mass. 77
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 Mass. 77 (Hinckley v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinckley v. Phelps, 84 Mass. 77 (Mass. 1861).

Opinion

Dewey, J.

There was no legal title to the premises demanded in this writ of entry that was the subject of attachment or levy of execution as the property of Ephraim S. Phelps, the insolvent debtor, of whose estate the demandant is assignee.

The facts agreed and stated for the consideration of the court, as to the manner in which the title of the tenant was acquired, fail to bring the case within the provisions of St. 1844, c. 107. If the assignee of the insolvent debtor has any remedy to recover of Mrs. Phelps any part of the money that was applied in payment for this real estate, it must be in some other form than by a writ of entry.

Judgment on the verdict for the tenant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. . Franklin
84 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Mass. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinckley-v-phelps-mass-1861.