Hinckley v. Boardman
3 Cai. Cas. 134
This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 134 (Hinckley v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hinckley v. Boardman, 3 Cai. Cas. 134 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
He should have appeared and contested the taxing. His not doing so is a waiver of his right. Had it been otherwise, I should think the costs of the common pleas only were recoverable, though we certainly might have allowed supreme court costs had we pleased so to do. As things are, you can take nothing by your motion, and must pay the costs of resisting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crane v. Gurnee
71 A. 338 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1908)
Lott v. Krakauer
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 60 (New York Marine Court, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinckley-v-boardman-nysupct-1805.