Hinchman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

93 A. 1085, 84 N.J. Eq. 504, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 369

Opinion

Per Curiam.

So far as the decree appealed from provides for the appointment of a receiver, and the sequestration of the property of appellant company located within the State of New Jersey,-we think it cannot be sustained. The remaining portions of the decree are justified by the facts proved; and to that extent the decree will be affirmed.

The respondent is entitled to costs.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — None. For modification — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 13.