Hinchman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

93 A. 1085, 84 N.J. Eq. 504, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 14, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 93 A. 1085 (Hinchman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinchman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co., 93 A. 1085, 84 N.J. Eq. 504, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 369 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

So far as the decree appealed from provides for the appointment of a receiver, and the sequestration of the property of appellant company located within the State of New Jersey,-we think it cannot be sustained. The remaining portions of the decree are justified by the facts proved; and to that extent the decree will be affirmed.

The respondent is entitled to costs.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — None. For modification — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A. 1085, 84 N.J. Eq. 504, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinchman-v-philadelphia-reading-railway-co-nj-1915.