Hinchliffe v. Shea

New York Supreme Court

Hinchliffe v. Shea

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365

DecidedDecember 15, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365 (Hinchliffe v. Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinchliffe v. Shea, 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Pratt, J.:

It may fairly be argued, since the case of Payne v. Becker (87 N. Y., 153), that the wife’s mortgage conveyed her inchoate right of dower to the mortgagee. If that be so, now that the right has become vested, it may be applied to the payment of the mortgage debt.

We are not disposed to interfere with the judgment below, which must be affirmed, but as the question is new, without costs.

Dtkman, J., concurred; Babnard, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt, J.:

It may fairly be argued, since the case of Payne v. Becker (87 N. Y., 153), that the wife’s mortgage conveyed her inchoate right of dower to the mortgagee. If that be so, now that the right has become vested, it may be applied to the payment of the mortgage debt.

We are not disposed to interfere with the judgment below, which must be affirmed, but as the question is new, without costs.

Dtkman, J., concurred; Babnard, P. J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinchliffe-v-shea-nysupct-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack