Hinchie v. Foster

15 S.C.L. 253
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1827
StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.C.L. 253 (Hinchie v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinchie v. Foster, 15 S.C.L. 253 (S.C. Ct. App. 1827).

Opinion

In this case the court decided, that to save costs, it is too late to tender money after a writ has been taken out, and signed and sealed by the clerk, although it has not yet been lodged with the sheriff. The plaintiff has already incurred the costs, and if the defendant admits the debt, he must pay the co .ts accrued. But the defendant having paid the money into court, which was taken out by the plaintiff, except so much as would pay the costs, it was held that the plaintiff’s accepting the money discharged the defendant from payment of costs.

[254]*254Where a defendant gets the leave of court, after action brought to pay money into court, it is always upon condition that he pays the costs then due.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.C.L. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinchie-v-foster-scctapp-1827.