Hinchee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hinchee v. State

1920 OK CR 115, 210 P. 295, 22 Okla. Crim. 157, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 29, 1920

DocketNo. A-3477.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 115 (Hinchee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hinchee v. State, 1920 OK CR 115, 210 P. 295, 22 Okla. Crim. 157, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

*158 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of forgery, and her punishment fixed as above stated. This appeal has been pending in this court since October 26, 1918. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted.

Rule 9 (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x); of this court provides :

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment. ’ ’

After an examination of the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment; and the same is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*158 PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of forgery, and her punishment fixed as above stated. This appeal has been pending in this court since October 26, 1918. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted.

Rule 9 (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x); of this court provides :

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment. ’ ’

After an examination of the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment; and the same is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 115, 210 P. 295, 22 Okla. Crim. 157, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinchee-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.