Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hinceman v. Lion

Hinceman v. Lion

686 S.E.2d 515, 363 N.C. 653, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 1528, 2009 WL 3837161
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 5, 2009
Docket4P09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 686 S.E.2d 515 (Hinceman v. Lion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hinceman v. Lion, 686 S.E.2d 515, 363 N.C. 653, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 1528, 2009 WL 3837161 (N.C. 2009).

Opinion

686 S.E.2d 515 (2009)

Cathy HINCEMAN, Employee
v.
FOOD LION, Self-Insured (Delhaize America, Inc., Servicing Agent), Employer.

No. 4P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2009.

Randy D. Duncan, Hickory, for Hinceman.

Joel K. Turner, Charlotte, for Food Lion, et al.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th of January 2009 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoke County Board of Education v. State
686 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 S.E.2d 515, 363 N.C. 653, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 1528, 2009 WL 3837161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hinceman-v-lion-nc-2009.