Hincapies v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hincapies v. New York City Transit Authority

1 A.D.2d 561, 767 N.Y.S.2d 645

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 561 (Hincapies v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hincapies v. New York City Transit Authority, 1 A.D.2d 561, 767 N.Y.S.2d 645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated November 27, 2002, which denied his motion to vacate an unsigned transcript of an oral decision of the same court dated February 28, 2001, dismissing the action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion to vacate an unsigned transcript of an oral decision (see CPLR 5512 [a]; Delgado v Clark, 307 AD2d 307 [2003]; Braithwaite v Braithwaite, 299 AD2d 383 [2002]; Chapin v Chapin, 295 AD2d 389, 390 [2002]; Matter of Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v Culley, 144 AD2d 363, 364 [1988]; Ojeda v Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717 [1986]; cf. CPLR 5701 [a] [3]; Dorizas v Island Insulation Corp., 254 AD2d 246 [1998]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Glover, J.), dated November 27, 2002, which denied his motion to vacate an unsigned transcript of an oral decision of the same court dated February 28, 2001, dismissing the action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from an order denying a motion to vacate an unsigned transcript of an oral decision (see CPLR 5512 [a]; Delgado v Clark, 307 AD2d 307 [2003]; Braithwaite v Braithwaite, 299 AD2d 383 [2002]; Chapin v Chapin, 295 AD2d 389, 390 [2002]; Matter of Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v Culley, 144 AD2d 363, 364 [1988]; Ojeda v Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717 [1986]; cf. CPLR 5701 [a] [3]; Dorizas v Island Insulation Corp., 254 AD2d 246 [1998]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 561, 767 N.Y.S.2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hincapies-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack