HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor
980 A.2d 910, 293 Conn. 927, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 23, 2009
DocketSC 18455
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 980 A.2d 910 (HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor, 980 A.2d 910, 293 Conn. 927, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 421 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 28 (AC 29821), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment as to the nuisance claim based on its determination that General Statutes § 13a-149 was the plaintiffs exclusive remedy when it also determined that the plaintiffs claim did not fall within § 13a-149?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor
39 A.3d 1065 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 910, 293 Conn. 927, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himmelstein-v-town-of-windsor-conn-2009.