HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor

980 A.2d 910, 293 Conn. 927, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 421
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 23, 2009·No. SC 18455·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 28 (AC 29821), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment as to the nuisance claim based on its determination that General Statutes § 13a-149 was the plaintiffs exclusive remedy when it also determined that the plaintiffs claim did not fall within § 13a-149?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor, 980 A.2d 910, 293 Conn. 927, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 421 (Colo. 2009).

980 A.2d 910 (HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of Windsor
39 A.3d 1065 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)