Himmelmann v. Bateman

California Supreme Court

Himmelmann v. Bateman

50 Cal. 11, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 72

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4106

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 50 Cal. 11 (Himmelmann v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Himmelmann v. Bateman, 50 Cal. 11, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 72 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The tenth section of the statute (Laws of 1862, p. 397), requires that the warrant, assessment and diagram shall be recorded, and provides: “When so recorded, the several amounts assessed shall be a lien upon the lands, lots,” etc.

The assessment and diagram, as recorded, contain no sufficient description of the lot to enforce the lien upon which this action is brought.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The tenth section of the statute (Laws of 1862, p. 397), requires that the warrant, assessment and diagram shall be recorded, and provides: “When so recorded, the several amounts assessed shall be a lien upon the lands, lots,” etc.

The assessment and diagram, as recorded, contain no sufficient description of the lot to enforce the lien upon which this action is brought.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cal. 11, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himmelmann-v-bateman-cal-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack