Himmelmann v. Bateman

50 Cal. 11, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 72
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4106·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The tenth section of the statute (Laws of 1862, p. 397), requires that the warrant, assessment and diagram shall be recorded, and provides: “When so recorded, the several amounts assessed shall be a lien upon the lands, lots,” etc.

The assessment and diagram, as recorded, contain no sufficient description of the lot to enforce the lien upon which this action is brought.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Himmelmann v. Bateman, 50 Cal. 11, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 72 (Cal. 1875).

50 Cal. 11 (Himmelmann v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orellana v. McAleenan
N.D. California, 2020
Blanchard v. Ladd
67 P. 131 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Gillis v. Cleveland
25 P. 351 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Lewis v. Champion
40 N.J. Eq. 59 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1885)
Whiting v. Quackenbush
54 Cal. 306 (California Supreme Court, 1880)