Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Himelfarb v. Christoffers

Himelfarb v. Christoffers

6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4987
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 5, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 997 (Himelfarb v. Christoffers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Himelfarb v. Christoffers, 6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition granted. Findings of fact insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. The subscribing witness was not eligible to sign. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Murphy, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himelfarb-v-christoffers-nyappdiv-1958.