Himel v. Sheraton Hotel of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Himel v. Sheraton Hotel of New Orleans

625 So. 2d 156, 1993 La. LEXIS 2747, 1993 WL 391050

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 1, 1993·No. No. 93-C-1439·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Summary judgment reversed. There are genuine issues of material fact or of mixed fact and law: whether the security guard owed a duty to protect the victim and whether he intentionally breached that duty without justification while in the course and scope of his employment. See LeBrane v. Lewis, 292 So.2d 216 (La.1974). Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Granted. Summary judgment reversed. There are genuine issues of material fact or of mixed fact and law: whether the security guard owed a duty to protect the victim and whether he intentionally breached that duty without justification while in the course and scope of his employment. See LeBrane v. Lewis, 292 So.2d 216 (La.1974). Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

Himel v. Sheraton Hotel of New Orleans, 625 So. 2d 156, 1993 La. LEXIS 2747, 1993 WL 391050 (La. 1993).

Pincite

625 So. 2d 156 (Himel v. Sheraton Hotel of New Orleans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related